<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>InteloQuence &#187; Google</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.inteloquent.com/category/google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.inteloquent.com</link>
	<description>InteloQuence is Marketing, Made Smarter.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 19:33:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How would you change Motorola&#8217;s Droid X?</title>
		<link>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/04/how-would-you-change-motorolas-droid-x/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/04/how-would-you-change-motorolas-droid-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Murph</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/how-would-you-change-motorolas-droid-x/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/how-would-you-change-motorolas-droid-x/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/droid-x-handhelf.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
<p>Last week we gave the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Apple/">Apple</a> loyalists in attendance a chance to <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/27/how-would-you-change-apples-iphone-4/">rip and rag the iPhone 4</a>, and this time around we&#8217;re doing the same for Motorola&#8217;s best frienemies. The <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/01/motorola-droid-x-review/">Droid X</a> is without question the largest Droid in the family today, and calling it a showstopper on <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/Verizon/">Verizon</a> would probably be understating things. Now that it&#8217;s been on the market a few months, we&#8217;re curious to know how you early adopters like (or dislike) it. Did the massive screen end up being too large for comfort? Anything you&#8217;d tweak software-wise? How&#8217;s
<p>&hellip; <a href="http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/04/how-would-you-change-motorolas-droid-x/" class="read_more">Read More</a></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/04/how-would-you-change-motorolas-droid-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Streamlines Its Privacy Policy. Should Facebook Be Next?</title>
		<link>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/04/google-streamlines-its-privacy-policy-should-facebook-be-next/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/04/google-streamlines-its-privacy-policy-should-facebook-be-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 02:13:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Alexia Tsotsis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techcrunch.com/?p=215758</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/echoecho.jpg" alt="" /><br />
Location-based service <a href="http://echoecho.me/Info/PC/">Echo Echo</a> recently posted the above image to their blog in a (successful) attempt to garner some media attention as the debate around online privacy continues to rage.</p>
<p>As extreme as their<a href="http://echoechome.wordpress.com/2010/08/22/if-mark-zuckerberg-cared-about-privacy/">&#8220;If Mark Zuckerberg Cared About Privacy&#8221;</a> example is, it does call attention to the <a href="http://www.facebook.com/policy.php">needless complexity</a> of various web service privacy agreements, settings and policies.</p>
<p>In the wake of a $<a href="http://www.techmeme.com/100903/p31#a100903p31">8.5 million lawsuit settlement</a> today, search giant Google made <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/trimming-our-privacy-policies.html">a gesture of good faith</a> in the &#8220;caring about privacy&#8221; department, assuring users that it was taking steps in order to make&hellip; <a href="http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/04/google-streamlines-its-privacy-policy-should-facebook-be-next/" class="read_more">Read More</a></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/04/google-streamlines-its-privacy-policy-should-facebook-be-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/d442840d878a0d027a177e8e2d66c7ae?s=96&amp;amp;d=identicon&amp;amp;r=G" length="" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/echoecho.jpg" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Logitech Revue and Google TV get very early blurrycam impressions</title>
		<link>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/logitech-revue-and-google-tv-get-very-early-blurrycam-impressions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/logitech-revue-and-google-tv-get-very-early-blurrycam-impressions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ross Miller</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/logitech-revue-and-google-tv-get-very-early-blurrycam-impression/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/logitech-revue-and-google-tv-get-very-early-blurrycam-impression/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/revue-blurry-review-rm-eng.jpg" alt="" /></a></div>
<p>Well, what do we have here? Looks like a Logitech beta user was kind enough to (potentially break his NDA and) show off his early grab: the <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/06/18/logitech-revue-gets-official-google-tv-companion-box-coming-thi/">Google TV-infused Revue</a>. What follows is a series of blurred photos that&#8217;d <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/05/logitech-revue-google-tv-box-hits-the-fcc/">make the FCC weep</a>, but all the same, who are we to critique news? The little unassuming box has HDMI in and out ports, a couple of USB inputs, ethernet, and SPDIF. According to the handler, installation was a &#8220;12-step process includes asking the details of your Google account, your physical location, TV, cable box, amp,
<p>&hellip; <a href="http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/logitech-revue-and-google-tv-get-very-early-blurrycam-impressions/" class="read_more">Read More</a></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/logitech-revue-and-google-tv-get-very-early-blurrycam-impressions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>LG Optimus One and Optimus Chic eyes-on</title>
		<link>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/lg-optimus-one-and-optimus-chic-eyes-on/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/lg-optimus-one-and-optimus-chic-eyes-on/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 22:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chris Ziegler</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/lg-optimus-one-and-optimus-chic-eyes-on/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/09/03/lg-optimus-one-and-optimus-chic-eyes-on/"><img vspace="4" hspace="4" border="1" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2010/09/lg-optimus-one-chic-ifa-15-sm.jpg"  alt="" /></a></div>
<p>That <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/08/30/lg-e720-with-android-leaks-its-no-galaxy-s-killer/">&#8220;leaked&#8221; low-end LG Android device</a> from a few days back? Turns out it was nothing more than the Optimus Chic, one of two Google-powered phones that the company <a href="http://www.engadget.com/2010/07/05/lg-debuts-optimus-smartphone-series-froyo-powered-one-and-ch/">announced</a> back in early July. They&#8217;re still not ready to let us touch the damned things here at <a href="http://www.engadget.com/tag/IFA/">IFA</a> &#8212; apparently on account of the fact that they&#8217;re not commercially available yet &#8212; but we got close enough to conclude that you definitely won&#8217;t be fooling anyone into thinking that you&#8217;ve dropped many hundreds of euros on your phone. You could argue that Huawei set
<p>&hellip; <a href="http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/lg-optimus-one-and-optimus-chic-eyes-on/" class="read_more">Read More</a></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/lg-optimus-one-and-optimus-chic-eyes-on/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DoubleClick Ad Planner’s Bestiality Bug (Screenshot)</title>
		<link>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/doubleclick-ad-planner%e2%80%99s-bestiality-bug-screenshot-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/doubleclick-ad-planner%e2%80%99s-bestiality-bug-screenshot-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 21:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erick Schonfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techcrunch.com/?p=215680</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/extreme-porn.png" class="snap_nopreview shot2" alt="" /></p>
<p>Is Google serving up ads targeted at sites which categorize themselves as &#8220;extreme porn,&#8221; bestiality,&#8221; and &#8220;child porn&#8221;?  Rest assured, it is not.  But if you are a website publisher using DoubleClick&#8217;s <a href="https://www.google.com/adplanner/">Ad Planner</a> to select categories to match your site to advertiser&#8217;s interests, you might think so.  The screenshot at right and below shows what one publisher found when choosing self-descriptive categories. Under &#8220;Adult&#8221; and &#8220;Porn&#8221; are those three categories.  The issue was first brought to Google&#8217;s attention in this <a href="http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/dfp/thread?tid=6c9db9f9ea6f3827&amp;hl=en&amp;fid=6c9db9f9ea6f382700048f5ff6ceb350">help forum</a>, and subsequently by TechCrunch.</p>
<p>It turns out this is a software bug, but what&hellip; <a href="http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/doubleclick-ad-planner%e2%80%99s-bestiality-bug-screenshot-2/" class="read_more">Read More</a></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/doubleclick-ad-planner%e2%80%99s-bestiality-bug-screenshot-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/extreme-porn.png" length="" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/doubleclickplanner.jpg" length="" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c3bdfd1fa541b9b648f1ac437739dfed?s=96&amp;amp;d=identicon&amp;amp;r=G" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Yahoo Search Assist Gets More Local, But Google Gets It Right</title>
		<link>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/yahoo-search-assist-gets-more-local-but-google-gets-it-right/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/yahoo-search-assist-gets-more-local-but-google-gets-it-right/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Erick Schonfeld</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techcrunch.com/?p=215641</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/yhoo-gran.png" class="snap_nopreview shot2" alt="" /></p>
<p>As you type into a search box on Yahoo or Google, a list of suggested keywords pops down below to help you complete your search faster.  Today, Yahoo t<a href="http://www.ysearchblog.com/2010/09/02/yahoo-search-serves-suggestions-closer-to-you/">urned on a local component</a> to its keyword autocomplete feature.  The search assist now serves up different keywords based on your location.</p>
<p>So if you type in &#8220;Santa&#8221; in northern California, &#8220;santa clara county&#8221; might be the first suggestion, but if you type it in southern California, &#8220;santa barbara&#8221; might be first.</p>
<p>Location is often a very relevant way to filter search, so this makes Yahoo&#8217;s search assist smarter.  But,&hellip; <a href="http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/yahoo-search-assist-gets-more-local-but-google-gets-it-right/" class="read_more">Read More</a></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/yahoo-search-assist-gets-more-local-but-google-gets-it-right/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/yhoo-gran.png" length="" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/google-gran.png" length="" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://0.gravatar.com/avatar/c3bdfd1fa541b9b648f1ac437739dfed?s=96&amp;amp;d=identicon&amp;amp;r=G" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google To Update, Shorten And De-Jargon Privacy Policies – Here’s What’s Changing</title>
		<link>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/google-to-update-shorten-and-de-jargon-privacy-policies-%e2%80%93-here%e2%80%99s-what%e2%80%99s-changing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/google-to-update-shorten-and-de-jargon-privacy-policies-%e2%80%93-here%e2%80%99s-what%e2%80%99s-changing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:33:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robin Wauters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techcrunch.com/?p=215562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/google-privacy.png" class="shot2" /></p>
<p>Mike Yang, Google&#8217;s Associate General Counsel, just <a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/09/trimming-our-privacy-policies.html">published</a> a post on the Google blog, informing users that the company is making its privacy policies shorter and easier to understand for non-lawyers. They are also making some other changes, but to be clear, the Mountain View company isn&#8217;t altering its privacy practices as such.</p>
<p>The updates will go into effect October 3, which is 30 days from now. </p>
<p>Until that time, all products and services will continue to be governed by the current version of the privacy policies and Google will update people on the changes via the&hellip; <a href="http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/google-to-update-shorten-and-de-jargon-privacy-policies-%e2%80%93-here%e2%80%99s-what%e2%80%99s-changing/" class="read_more">Read More</a></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/google-to-update-shorten-and-de-jargon-privacy-policies-%e2%80%93-here%e2%80%99s-what%e2%80%99s-changing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/google-privacy-changes.png" length="" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/09/google-privacy.png" length="" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9ab06106c89a573cd4ef50d04ce3203c?s=96&amp;amp;d=identicon&amp;amp;r=G" length="" type="" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google Hopeful Of 2010 Launch For iTunes Rival Despite Lack Of Signed Label Deals</title>
		<link>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/google-hopeful-of-2010-launch-for-itunes-rival-despite-lack-of-signed-label-deals/</link>
		<comments>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/google-hopeful-of-2010-launch-for-itunes-rival-despite-lack-of-signed-label-deals/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 11:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Robin Wauters</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas web design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas website design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techcrunch.com/?p=215466</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/music_logo-gif-gif-image-180x40-pixels.png" class="shot2"/></p>
<p>We all know <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/04/googles-itunes-competitor-will-likely-be-called-google-music/">Google Music</a> is <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/05/20/um-did-google-just-quietly-launch-a-web-based-itunes-competitor-yep/#ixzz0oUJBJO3l">coming</a>, it&#8217;s just a question of when &#8211; and what it&#8217;ll look like, of course. According to <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE6815ZQ20100902">Reuters</a>, Google hopes to launch the service as early as December 2010.</p>
<p>Citing unnamed &#8216;people familiar with the matter&#8217;, Reuters says Google&#8217;s VP of Engineering <a href="http://www.crunchbase.com/person/andy-rubin">Andy Rubin</a> (which we likened to a <a href="http://techcrunch.com/2010/01/06/andy-rubin-steve-jobs/">Steve Jobs-caliber</a> product fanatic in the past) is spearheading talks with music labels on plans for a digital music download store and cloud-based song locker service, which he hopes will see the light of day before year&#8217;s end. &hellip; <a href="http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/google-hopeful-of-2010-launch-for-itunes-rival-despite-lack-of-signed-label-deals/" class="read_more">Read More</a></p>
<div style="display:block"><small><em></em></small></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.inteloquent.com/2010/09/03/google-hopeful-of-2010-launch-for-itunes-rival-despite-lack-of-signed-label-deals/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/9ab06106c89a573cd4ef50d04ce3203c?s=96&amp;amp;d=identicon&amp;amp;r=G" length="" type="" />
<enclosure url="http://tctechcrunch.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/music_logo-gif-gif-image-180x40-pixels.png" length="" type="" />
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic page generated in 0.911 seconds. -->
<!-- Cached page generated by WP-Super-Cache on 2010-09-04 20:27:06 -->
